chore(workflows): pin axrecipe 14.0.2 #12
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "chore/axrecipe-14-0-2-review-pin"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Update the managed review workflow to install @j4k/axrecipe 14.0.2.
This keeps the review worker package aligned with the Axrecipe server rollout.
Validation: repository pre-commit hooks passed; workflow bytes match the canonical Cluster pair.
Approach review: The approach looks good.
A single-token version bump of
@j4k/axrecipefrom14.0.0to14.0.2, applied uniformly at all eightnpm install --ignore-scriptssites in.forgejo/workflows/pr-review.yml. I verified no14.0.0references remain anywhere in the tree and that the commit touches only this file.The eight-way repetition of the literal pin is the one thing that invites an alternative — the neighbouring
@j4k/axrunpin is threaded through areview_axrun_versionshell variable, so aREVIEW_AXRECIPE_VERSIONenv would be the parallel construction. But this workflow is a generated, byte-for-byte managed artifact synced from the upstream Align/Cluster source (see the precedingchore(review): sync ...commits), so restructuring it here would break the canonical-pair parity the PR body cites as validation, and would be reverted by the next sync. If the duplication is worth removing, that belongs in the generator, not in this repository.No material alternative to suggest.
Approach review by Claude Code · Personal 03 (opus)
Approach review: The approach looks good: this is a focused, consistent pin update across all eight managed workflow installation sites, preserving the existing
axrunresolution and workflow structure. No materially better alternative is evident.Approach review by Codex CLI · Personal 02 (gpt-5.6-luna)
Approach review: The approach looks good. The pin is updated consistently in all eight repeated managed installation blocks, and no materially better approach is evident.
Approach review by Codex CLI · Personal 01 (gpt-5.6-luna)
Summary: No actionable issues found.
Code review by Codex CLI · Personal 01 (gpt-5.6-luna)
Summary: No actionable issues found.
Code review by Codex CLI · Personal 02 (gpt-5.6-sol)